Scott V Shepherd
Scott v Shepherd - 1773 (Famous Squib) - LawTeacher.net
Scott v Shepherd [1773] 96 Eng. Rep. 525 Law of Tort – Causation – Novus Actus Interveniens – Remoteness of Damage – Trespass Facts The defendant threw a squib, which is a small, lit firework, into a busy marketplace with lots of people and stalls. In order to protect themselves and avoid damage, the squib was thrown on by two other people.
https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/scott-v-shepherd.php
Scott v. Shepherd | Case Brief for Law Students
Shepard (Defendant) threw a lighted squib into a crowded marketplace. As a result, two other patrons threw the squib until it struck Scott (Plaintiff) in the face, injuring him. Plaintiff sued Defendant for trespass and assault. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Everyone who does an unlawful act is considered as the doer of all that follows. Facts.
https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-epstein/strict-liability-and-negligence-historic-and-analytic-foundations/scott-v-shepherd/
Scott v Shepherd - Wikipedia
Scott v. Shepherd 96 Eng. Rep. 525 (K.B. 1773), commonly known as the "flying squib case," is an important English tort law case on remoteness and the principle of novus actus interveniens as it related to the division between trespass and case. [1] Contents 1 Facts 2 Judgment 3 Dissent 4 References 5 See also Facts [ edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_v_Shepherd
Scott v Shepherd - Case Summary - IPSA LOQUITUR
Scott v Shepherd - Case Summary - IPSA LOQUITUR Scott v Shepherd High Court Citations: (1773) 2 Blackstone W 892. Facts The defendant (a child) threw a lit squib across a market. It landed at the feet of a third-party, who picked up and threw the squib onwards to prevent injury to himself. The squib hit the claimant, burning the claimant’s face.
https://ipsaloquitur.com/tort-law/cases/scott-v-shepherd/
Scott v. Shepherd, 96 Eng.Rep. 525 (1773): Case Brief Summary
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs... Scott v. Shepherd King’s Bench 96 Eng.Rep. 525 (1773) Facts On October 28, 1770, Shepherd (defendant) threw a lighted squib ( i.e., a parcel containing gunpowder that was on fire) into a marketplace. The squib landed near a stand where Yates was selling gingerbread.
https://www.quimbee.com/cases/scott-v-shepherd
Scott v. Shepherd, 215 Ala. 671 | Casetext Search + Citator
Full title: SCOTT v. SHEPHERD, Clerk of Circuit Court Court: Supreme Court of Alabama Date published: Apr 14, 1927 Citations 112 So. 137 (Ala. 1927) 112 So. 137 Citing Cases Ex Parte Watkins The statute, as amended, giving the right of a married woman to appeal without giving security for cost… Nichols v. Snead
https://casetext.com/case/scott-v-shepherd
SCOTT v. SHEPHERD | 215 Ala. 671 | Ala. | Judgment | Law - Casemine
SCOTT v. SHEPHERD Supreme Court of Alabama. Apr 14, 1927 Subsequent References CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) SCOTT v. SHEPHERD Important Paras The judgment which appellant would bring into review without making bond was rendered at the end of a statutory action of ejectment.
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914a74cadd7b049346e9d75Video of Scott v. Shepherd - LexisNexis Courtroom Cast
Scott v. Shepherd Court of Common Pleas, 1773 96 Eng. Rep. 525 Listen to the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact Summary Defendant threw a lighted squib (an explosive device) into a crowded market place. Two men threw the squib out of their stalls before it exploded in plaintiff's eyes. Rule of Law and Holding Sign In to view the Rule of Law and Holding
https://courtroomcast.lexisnexis.com/acf_cases/9025-scott-v-shepherd
Scott V Shepherd - Judgment - LiquiSearch
Scott V Shepherd - Judgment Judgment The majority held Shepherd was fully liable, because, said De Gray CJ, "I do not consider as free agents in the present case, but acting under a compulsive necessity for their own safety and self-preservation." Nares J wrote the following. “ I am of opinion that trespass would well lie in the present case.
https://www.liquisearch.com/scott_v_shepherd/judgment
Scott V. Shepherd Profiles | Facebook
View the profiles of people named Scott V. Shepherd. Join Facebook to connect with Scott V. Shepherd and others you may know. Facebook gives people the...
https://www.facebook.com/public/Scott-V.-ShepherdShepherd v. Scott - Supreme Court of Ohio
[Cite as Shepherd v. Scott, 2002-Ohio-4417.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ... CHARLOTTE S. SHEPHERD, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES CASE NO. 5-02-22 v. GERALD SCOTT, ET AL. O P I N I O N DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Civil Appeal from Common Pleas Court JUDGMENT: Judgment Affirmed. DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY ...
https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/3/2002/2002-Ohio-4417.pdf